~By wawame
It just doesn’t get any better than that, does it? Every emotion you could possibly feel all wrapped up in a five minute span. After all this time, their characters and their stories still rock me to my core. But, someone thought the concept needed fixing. So, they fixed it. Romances the caliber of Steve and Kayla’s eventually came to an end. Soaps have never been the same.
In my opinion, and much to my dismay, soap operas are broken. Not a day goes by that we don’t read some comment or article reinforcing that notion. Overall viewership is down, and come September, another one of the daytime serial dramas that has seemingly been with us forever will come to an end. Soap operas are definitely broken, and yet no one who is in charge of writing these American icons seems to know why. In fact, TPTB seem to sit back and scratch their heads in wistful denial while blaming the viewers (or lack thereof) as, one by one, soap operas continue their path to extinction. It’s been implied that some of us apparently don’t ’get it’; an implication that the storylines of today’s soaps are a tad too ‘smart’ or ’cutting edge’ for our liking. Add to that, the twenty or so of us online posters that continually complain of these ‘smart’ and ‘edgy’ storylines deserve little consideration. We may be viewers, but unless we are one of the extreme few who have a Neilson box or belong to a focus group, our opinions are moot. Speaking of, did you know that in 2009 there were only 25,000 total American households that participated in the Nielsen daily metered system, representing over 114,500,000 American households that had televisions? That’s right… 0.02183% got to decide what the remaining 99.97817% got to watch on their TV. But such is our gauge, and we accept it. Still, you would think that since a soap writer’s income can depend on the success and longevity of their stories, they would at least contemplate what those ‘twenty’ or so angry online folks are saying. In fact, by Neilson Rating standards, those ‘twenty’ would represent approximately 100,000 viewers… viewers that just might fall into that oh-so-coveted 18-49 demographic. The thing is, we know it’s more than ‘twenty’ that are screaming for change… a hell of a lot more.
It’s a pity that TPTB sometimes turn a deaf ear or discount such a large representation of their viewers, seeing how the vast majority of both past and present viewers (online and not) have a good idea of what it will take to help save our soaps… or at least give them a chance to go out in a blaze of glory. Viewers are, after all, the very life blood of soaps. We know what we want. Apparently, so do the actors who made our soaps great.
So what happened? Why is the concept of ‘supercoupling’ now considered nothing short of a myriad of curse words, a sure formula for eventual failure? They were the epitome of romance and every soap had them. Every soap is remembered for them. They personified the glory days of soap operas and gave many their highest ratings. Now we are continually served what is touted as ’true romance’, where in reality, what we are being served is nothing more than lust-filled trysts; acts so shallow that even the most dedicated fan can’t help but scoff. The majority of today’s couples are nothing more than two bodies that pass in the night. They marry and divorce countless times, all within the span of a few months… sometimes a few weeks, but not before cheating on the one they swore they would love forever. The thing is, we don’t expect our rooting couples to be perfect, but we do expect them to be at least ‘rootable’. But there are no true romantic heroes or heroines (anti- or not) to root for. Now, we only have characters who are painted the dullest and darkest shades of gray; characters who turn on a dime and change their undying devotions as much as they change their underwear. True romance seems to be a thing of the past. It left when the formula writing for supercouples became taboo. Slowly and surely, the viewers started leaving, too.
It seems that, somewhere down the line, someone decided that the concept of ‘supercouples’ was detrimental to soaps. In fact, it has been stated that supercouples ‘eroded the genre, making it predictable and boring’. Ken Corday of ‘Days of Our Lives’, titan of the very soap that attained enormous success because of the ‘supercouples’ concept, stated, “I’ve never believed in it. Either people are involved in a good story or they’re not. They’re an interesting couple or they’re not.” Well Ken, many are still waiting for that good story… those of us who haven’t already left, that is.
Do I think bringing back the ‘supercouple’ concept will save soaps? It sure wouldn’t hurt. But I’m wise enough to know that supercouples themselves do tend to have a limited shelf life, considering soap writers have a limited concept of how to write for a happily married couple. (Boring, they say… though my long and happy marriage has been anything but.) I know that when two characters achieve such status, it is unthinkable for the invested viewers to accept a break-up, infidelity, or to accept without question that their preferred couple simply fell out of love. Heaven forbid they should remain faithful as a married couple and struggle with life’s sometimes unfair demands. Soap writers might actually have to think outside the box if that were to happen. Shudder.
It’s the core ingredient that defines a supercouple that can help save the genre. It’s that basic ’supercouple’ ingredient that is so painfully absent from today’s soaps. It’s what made supercouples so popular and unforgettable; the fundamental component that so many watched soaps for in the first place. That ingredient is romance… true, unadulterated, blissful, and sometimes painful romance. It is the one thing that so many who post on the soap boards continually, consistently, and animatedly beg for; a good story with real romance… long-suffering, angst-filled, passionate, rewarding, and unmistakably real romance. It defined every supercouple that existed. Even still, we’re not asking for a new generation of supercouples, we’re just looking for the ride. Writers don’t have to give us inseparable pairings, but surely they can give us the romance. We may not get to eat the cake, but at least let us taste the icing.
Do I want a rewrite of Steve and Kayla? No. Their story is not ‘broken‘, so I don’t want it ‘fixed’. Their story cannot be duplicated, nor do I want it to be. ‘Days’ had a chance to expand it, to recapture what Stephen Nichols and Mary Beth Evans could undoubtedly deliver. But, ’Days’ blew it… big time. Never has such a golden opportunity been wasted. Now that Stephen in on The Young and the Restless as the infamous Tucker McCall and Mary Beth has been cast as Sara Garrett on The Bay, I find myself ‘wanting’ again. I find myself wanting to feel what I once felt when the concept of ‘supercoupling’ was indeed the norm. I want to see real and true romance play across my screen. I want to feel my heart flutter as I witness a stolen glance. I want to ball my fist in frustration when yet another tender moment is so rudely interrupted. I want to hold my breath after what seems to be forever, a first kiss is shared… or the first one in a very long time. I want to wipe my tears when the inevitable break-up comes about. I want to cry when they cry, and laugh when they laugh. I want to live my fantasies through the characters, week after week, month after month, year after year. True romance never grows old and it’s never, ever boring… especially since there are so many ways to write it. Dedicated viewers have proven as much, seeing how so many have stuck around and tolerated the lunacy, all while hoping that one day, true romance will make a return.
“My most vivid memory of my time on Days of our Lives is that every time I walked into a meeting with a long story and sat down beside Al Rabin (‘Days’ producer), he’d say, ‘Well, where’s the romance?’….”- Leah Laiman, ‘Days’ Head Writer ’86-’88 (quoted from ‘Days – 25 Years of Romance’ magazine)
I wish Maria Arena Bell and Hogan Sheffer would ask that question. I’m hoping Gregori J. Martin will, too. (Considering his vision and the talent he has already signed, I actually hold hope that he already has.) Regardless, half the answer is already on their shows. If anyone wonders why there are those who want Mary Beth to join Y&R and/or Stephen to join The Bay, I suggest reading last week’s blog by Liz. Stephen and Mary Beth certainly have the chemistry. They definitely have the work ethic. They clearly enjoy working together, having stated so time and time again. And, they definitely can spin gold when given little more than straw. We, the viewers, can have what we so desperately miss if TPTB were to ever consider the possibility. I hope they do, because something tells me this may be one of the last chances we will have in seeing the caliber of soap opera romance these two actors can deliver. From their first encounter or when they reacquaint, through their trials and tribulations, to the ultimate payoff, to their inevitable end (or is it?)… these two actors, if the writing is there, could once again make a permanent and indelible impression deep inside our fluttering hearts.
And it could damn sure help with the ratings… just like this did.
Copyright © 2011
This content is for personal, non-commercial use only. The use of this content on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is on any other site than www.snandmbe.com it makes the page or post you are viewing an infringement of the copyright.
3 comments